Hi Rob,
Instead of creating 2 versions, why not both collaborate on one version and
therefore reduce the amount of confusion around. I would recommend placing
it at Sourceforge and you can both collaborate for future releases.
Just a thought.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "tBB" <tbb@hideout.ath.cx>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:00 PM
To: <clamav-win32@lists.clamav.net>
Subject: Re: [clamav-win32] Clam for W32 updates? Forgotten project?
> Rob McEwen wrote:
>
>> I'm confused about all the different versions... and not all of them
>> work as well as others. I needed a native win32 version that was
>> stable... and the one that Bret links to above is the _only_ one I was
>> able to find that satisfied that criteria. All the others (which I could
>> find) either were not stable, or were running in unix emulation mode
>> (cygwin). (not saying there isn't another stable win32 version... I may
>> not have tried them all... but, at the time I tested, this was the only
>> one that didn't crash frequently.)
>
> Actually there are not that many. There is the 'official' version from
> http://w32.clamav.net/ which is currently outdated, probably because the
> maintainer (Nigel Horne) has other priorities meanwhile as he became
> ClamAV's product manager. Then there are the versions at
> http://oss.netfarm.it and http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav (mine). Both
> should really run equally well as they use the same codebase which is
> maintained by Gianluigi Tiesi (the main programmer behind the ClamWin
> engine). Personally I would stay away from Cygwin versions too.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nico
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
>
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
(text/plain)