Robert Wolfe wrote:
| On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0200
| Gianluigi Tiesi <
sherpya@netfarm.it> wrote:
|
|> | So, to reiterate my question: Must "foo" be GPL-licensed as well?
|>
|> it must be gpl-compatible, you could make this kind of use with a non gpl compatible license
|> if libclamav was lgpl
|
| I would think that this would apply only if the program 'foo' were to be distributed to the world. However, if it is an
application for internal use only, I would think that this does not apply.
|
gpl implies you need to give sources of what distribute in binary form
together with the binary
if the binary is not public you don't need to distribute to public
Regards
- --
Gianluigi Tiesi <
sherpya@netfarm.it>
EDP Project Leader
Netfarm S.r.l. -
http://www.netfarm.it/
Free Software:
http://oss.netfarm.it/
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
(text/plain)