On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0200
Gianluigi Tiesi <
sherpya@netfarm.it> wrote:
> | So, to reiterate my question: Must "foo" be GPL-licensed as well?
>
> it must be gpl-compatible, you could make this kind of use with a non gpl compatible license
> if libclamav was lgpl
I would think that this would apply only if the program 'foo' were to be distributed to the world. However, if it is an application for internal use only, I would think that this does not apply.
--
Robert Wolfe <robertwolfe@localnet.com>
"The only good thing about Vista is that even
the viruses have compatibility issues. "
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32