Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:31:06PM +0100, G.W. Haywood said:
> > >
> > > > Here's a graph of the memory used by clamd on one of my servers:
> > > > http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/clamav-milter-0.9x.gif
> > >
> > > .... can you also plot the number of signatures that clamav had
> > > loaded at each point?
> >
> > http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/virus_database_count.gif
> >
> > The spikes in the graph are real, but as you can see the counts
> > quickly return to normal.
>
> It looks to me like, all things considered, clamav is getting
> incrementally better at memory management relative to the size of
> the databases it loads, with an obvious large jump or two.
Yes, that's what I said in my OP. :) Thanks all.
But it doesn't explain the memoory consumption...
--
73,
Ged.
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
%20%20Thanks%20all.%0A>%20%0A>%20But%20it%20doesn't%20explain%20the%20memoory%20consumption...%0A>%20%0A>%20--%0A>%20%0A>%2073,%0A>%20Ged.%0A>%20%0A>%20 "Reply to this message")
(text/plain)
