On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:33:18 -0400
"David F. Skoll" <
dfs@roaringpenguin.com> wrote:
> OK, sounds good. Question: We ship ClamAV (plus source as required by GPL)
> with a commercial (non-GPL) product. We make use of ClamAV only
> through the clamdscan interface over a socket. Do you consider that
> to be a "derivative product"? I do not, but I'd like to know where you
> stand.
IANAL but I don't consider it a derivative product.
>
> > The intention is to make ClamAV available under a commercial license as
> > well.
>
> How will you be sure you have removed all contributed code whose copyright
> is not owned by Sourcefire?
The code base clean-up will be limited to libclamav and will be carefully
based on the analysis of the ChangeLog, CVS and SVN entries.
Best regards,
--
oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <tkojm@clamav.net>
(\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
\..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
//\ /\ Fri Aug 17 20:03:02 CEST 2007
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
(text/plain)