On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:40:48 +0200
Tomasz Kojm <
tkojm@clamav.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200
> Urban Hillebrand <uml1@inode.at> wrote:
>
> > We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have
> > reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan -
> > however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if clamd
> > is not responding (due to a crash or a misconfiguration).
> >
> > With the newly introduced delays during the initialization of clamscan
> > this would cause us significant problems. So my question is: Will this get
> > fixed, or is this "working as expected"?
>
> We're aware of the problem and it will be fixed in 0.91.
It should be fixed now in SVN:
Mon Apr 30 15:24:28 CEST 2007 (tk)
----------------------------------
* libclamav: use BM matcher to handle .mdb sigs
--
oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <tkojm@clamav.net>
(\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
\..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
//\ /\ Mon Apr 30 15:29:41 CEST 2007
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html