Sorry...went to the web postings and realized the response was for a
different issue, not related to mine.
My apologies
Seth Bush
Information Systems Security Manager
CAS, Inc.
5021 Technology Drive
Huntsville, AL 35805
CAGE: 4S077
Ph: 256-895-8861
Fax: 256-895-8633
seth.bush@cas-inc.com
anthony.seth.bush@us.army.mil
-----Original Message-----
From:
clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:
clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Seth.Bush
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:23 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays
I'm not sure how this addresses my problem stated below...
"I am installing clamAV on IRIX 6.5. I have already read the postings in
the archives regarding errors with gcc and cc during builds. Not my
case.
I found how to gunzip and "un"-tar the clamAV on IRIX to build from
source. I ran the configure script as shown in
www.clamav.net/doc/latest/clamdoc.pdf. I also ran make as shown, but
only a small part of the build completed before it produced an error
"ld32: ERROR 33 : Unresolved text symbol 'gzgets'"."
Seth Bush
Information Systems Security Manager
CAS, Inc.
5021 Technology Drive
Huntsville, AL 35805
CAGE: 4S077
Ph: 256-895-8861
Fax: 256-895-8633
seth.bush@cas-inc.com
anthony.seth.bush@us.army.mil
-----Original Message-----
From:
clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:
clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kojm
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:41 PM
To:
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200
Urban Hillebrand <
uml1@inode.at> wrote:
> We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have
> reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan
-
> however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if
clamd
> is not responding (due to a crash or a misconfiguration).
>
> With the newly introduced delays during the initialization of clamscan
this
> would cause us significant problems. So my question is: Will this get
> fixed, or is this "working as expected"?
We're aware of the problem and it will be fixed in 0.91.
--
oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <tkojm@clamav.net>
(\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
\..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
//\ /\ Wed Apr 25 20:40:23 CEST 2007
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
(text/plain)