On 4/11/07, John Rudd <
john@rudd.cc> wrote:
> Depends on what your goals are.
>
> For me, a reliable email system does not just mean "mail gets
> delivered". It also means that "we reliably reject detectable viruses".
> If we're letting viruses through because our pants are down (because
> our AV tool has failed), then that's not a reliable email system.
> That's a dysfunctional email system.
Agreed...
> better monitoring and notification: yes, good.
Check out argus (
http://argus.tcp4me.com) .. Works wonderfully for me.
> It's like using condoms. Just because you run out of condoms doesn't
> make unprotected sex suddenly "safe". Accepting email from the world
> without your AV tool processing it is as irresponsible as having
> unprotected sex with the entire world.
Ugh.. Thanks.. I'm gonna have nightmares for weeks now..
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
XenoPhage0@gmail.com
http://blog.godshell.com
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
(text/plain)