From clamav-devel-bounces@lists.clamav.net Thu Mar 12 19:24:15 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: list@tad.clamav.net Delivered-To: list@tad.clamav.net X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLW8pcejP74Z; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:24:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768BC31C022; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:24:14 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: clamav-devel@tad.clamav.net Delivered-To: clamav-devel@tad.clamav.net X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v2skLJUvjUTF for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:24:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from Quad (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F1E16C2AD for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:24:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:27:10 +0100 From: Tomasz Kojm To: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net Message-ID: <20090312192710.2b52a635@Quad> In-Reply-To: <747dc8f30903120847t143d8bedic8f3dfff89b9e720@mail.gmail.com> References: <49ABA963.2070607@average.org> <20090312163415.258c427f@Quad> <747dc8f30903120847t143d8bedic8f3dfff89b9e720@mail.gmail.com> Organization: ClamAV X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Clamav-devel] New 0.95 API concerns X-BeenThere: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ClamAV Development List-Id: ClamAV Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: clamav-devel-bounces@lists.clamav.net Errors-To: clamav-devel-bounces@lists.clamav.net On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:47:28 -0300 Renato Botelho wrote: > Since API was chenged one more time, a new RC will be released to > 0.95? I'm just asking it because I maintain clamav at FreeBSD ports > and I tested all dependant ports with clam 0.95-RC1 and notified > maintainers of all ports that doesn't build with new API to fix it. I'm just > wondering if with these new changes those ports can or not break > again. Hi Renato, due to some changes and Safe Browsing support, we will be publishing a new release candidate on March 16, however I believe these particular changes to the API shouldn't have much impact on the 3rd party applications at this point. Thanks, -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Thu Mar 12 19:26:41 CET 2009 _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net