From clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net  Tue Jul  1 13:09:30 2008
Return-Path: <clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net>
X-Original-To: list@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: list@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id rxqVB5fpBQmJ; Tue,  1 Jul 2008 13:09:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED95516C085;
	Tue,  1 Jul 2008 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id USY-RDS-M4-o for <clamav-users@tad.clamav.net>;
	Tue,  1 Jul 2008 13:09:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk (jubileegroup.co.uk [217.147.177.250])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5133C16C041
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>;
	Tue,  1 Jul 2008 13:09:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: pass (mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk: domain of ged@jubileegroup.co.uk
	designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender)
	receiver=mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk; client-ip=127.0.0.1;
	helo=mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk;
	envelope-from=ged@jubileegroup.co.uk;
	x-software=spfmilter 0.97 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with
	libspf2-1.0.0; 
Received: from mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id
	m61B99lo014683
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:09:09 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk: ged owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:09:08 +0100 (BST)
From: "G.W. Haywood" <ged@jubileegroup.co.uk>
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1.1214906403.28040.clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0807011107270.12711@mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk>
References: <mailman.1.1214906403.28040.clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6
	(mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk [0.0.0.0]);
	Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:09:09 +0100 (BST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 192.168.1.2
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav know virus count reduced.
X-BeenThere: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Id: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users.lists.clamav.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Help: <mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net
Errors-To: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net

Hi there,

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote:

> "G.W. Haywood" <ged@jubileegroup.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync
> > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing
> > about with HTTP?
>
> The atomic-rsync would have to be used instead of freshclam on all
> 2M+ clients and this is not an option.

Why would all clients be required to use the same method?

--

73,
Ged.
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml