From clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net  Mon Dec 17 20:15:46 2007
Return-Path: <clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net>
X-Original-To: list@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: list@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id mhMRlp6iv+py; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:15:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497E516C010;
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:15:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id M+cobbpPabGc for <clamav-users@tad.clamav.net>;
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:15:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.molsci.org (s1.molsci.org [209.172.112.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC7316C00A
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>;
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:15:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 7693 invoked by uid 501); 17 Dec 2007 11:15:25 -0800
Received: from 209.172.112.203 (fchan@molsci.org@209.172.112.203) by
	s1.molsci.org (envelope-from <fchan@molsci.org>,
	uid 509) with qmail-scanner-2.01st 
	(clamdscan: 0.91.2/4787. spamassassin: 3.2.3. perlscan: 2.01st.  
	Clear:RC:0(209.172.112.203):SA:0(-101.5/10.0):. 
	Processed in 6.763443 secs); 17 Dec 2007 19:15:25 -0000
Received: from 209.172.112.203.molsci.org (HELO ?209.172.112.203?)
	(fchan@molsci.org@209.172.112.203)
	by mail.molsci.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP;
	17 Dec 2007 11:15:18 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240801c38c79c560a4@[209.172.112.203]>
In-Reply-To: <837a8ad10712170847q7876287eta936f45c686572b8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <837a8ad10712170847q7876287eta936f45c686572b8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:15:21 -0800
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
From: fchan <fchan@molsci.org>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] help, can't compile clamav-0.92 ("gcc bug")
X-BeenThere: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Id: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users.lists.clamav.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Help: <mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net
Errors-To: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net

Hi,
I have the same thing happening a my MacBookPro. I get this message also:
checking for gcc bug PR28045... configure: error: your compiler has 
gcc PR28045 bug, use a different compiler, see 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28045

I'm using xcode_2.4.1_8m and I'm downloading xcode_3.0 to hopefully 
resolve this issue and hopefully that Apple updated gcc on this newer 
xcode. Any other Mac people seen this issue?

Thank you,
Frank

>Hi!
>
>We are using Ubuntu 6.06 LTS (Dapper Drake) on x86 boxes, and 6.06 uses gcc
>4.0.3...and as such, we cannot compile the new clamav-0.92:
>
>     checking for a supported version of gcc... ok (4.0.3)
>     checking for gcc bug PR27603... ok, bug not present
>     checking for gcc bug PR28045... configure: error: your compiler has gcc
>PR28045 bug, use a different compiler, see
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28045
>
>How do you "use a different compiler"?  gcc 4.0.3 is what 6.06 LTS
>provides...I don't know how to change this (??).
>
>If I were to disable compiler optimizations in the clamav build, could I
>work around this bug in gcc 4.0.3?  Which clamav file(s) have a problem with
>this bug?
>
>Thank you for any assistance!
>
>--Ed
>_______________________________________________
>Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
>http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

