From clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net  Fri Aug 17 19:14:41 2007
Return-Path: <clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net>
X-Original-To: list@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: list@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id EjQ4qDyi-jrc; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:14:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30D816C10B;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:14:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id TtaWZ63+zNkG for <clamav-users@tad.clamav.net>;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: delayed 3326 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at tad;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:14:23 CEST
Received: from que03.charter.net (que03.charter.net [209.225.8.191])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495C916C0D3
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aa03.charter.net ([10.20.200.155]) by mtai03.charter.net
	(InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP
	id <20070817161852.RYXB21729.mtai03.charter.net@aa03.charter.net>
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:18:52 -0400
Received: from BILLING ([71.14.74.130]) by aa03.charter.net with SMTP
	id <20070817161852.WDHO7864.aa03.charter.net@BILLING>
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:18:52 -0400
Message-ID: <018301c7e0ea$4fc1f9b0$6500a8c0@BILLING>
From: "Jay West" <jwest@ezwind.net>
To: "ClamAV users ML" <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
References: <20070817130011.680c5fe4@localhost>	<200708171226.l7HCQGlY032593@wrenkasky.com><20070817165300.375250a9@localhost>
	<46C5C5E5.3010206@roaringpenguin.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:18:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Chzlrs: 0
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Sourcefire acquires ClamAV
X-BeenThere: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Id: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users.lists.clamav.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Help: <mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net
Errors-To: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net

David wrote...
> Sourcefire is a public company.  As such, its directors have a
> fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of Sourcefire investors.
Pendantic mode...
Public/Private has no bearing on the issue. Private companies mostly act in 
the interest of the private shareholders which is generally the same 
interest shown by public shareholders in public companies.

> So: How is Sourcefire planning to make money from ClamAV?  I would
> feel much more comforted if a Sourcefire rep could explain this.
> (Public companies don't make acquisitions for the good of the
> community; they make them for the good of their shareholders.)
I can think of two possible scenarios from other examples in the industry: 
First, they may offer priority support contracts which many corporate users 
will want to pay for so they have direct and/or priority support, etc. 
Second, they may provide specific add-ons and features that are available 
for a fee, just like Sendmail.Org has done. This doesn't mean the code is 
really "forked", as the commercial version may be merely addons, conditional 
compiles, etc.

I am not implying having any special knowledge or information. I'm merely 
illustrating what I have seen other companies do.

I would suggest waiting and seeing what happens over a period of time, say a 
year. As long as some of the new enhancements, bugfixes, etc. trickle into 
the code (or the free version of the code, if they go that route)... I'd be 
quite happy. May even pay for the commercial support.

Jay West 

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

