From clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net  Fri Aug 17 17:28:53 2007
Return-Path: <clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net>
X-Original-To: list@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: list@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id vDVFzLOOb7do; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:28:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28E516C07F;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:28:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
Delivered-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id IP04Pw2jymq9 for <clamav-users@tad.clamav.net>;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.rudd.cc (rudd.cc [69.12.154.165])
	by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F8A16C083
	for <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:28:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.rudd.cc (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 5.1.11 _community_)
	with PIPE id 1197414; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:28:35 -0700
X-RUDD-CC-Sender: <john@rudd.cc>
X-RUDD-CC-Scanned-By: host.rudd.cc
X-RUDD-CC-Submitted-Via: SMTP [10.0.1.210]
X-RUDD-CC-ClamAVCheck: No, signature=none
Received: from host.rudd.cc (account john [10.0.1.210] verified)
	by mail.rudd.cc (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11 _community_)
	with ESMTPSA id 1197412 for clamav-users@lists.clamav.net;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:28:31 -0700
Message-ID: <46C5BE99.30104@rudd.cc>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:28:25 -0700
From: John Rudd <john@rudd.cc>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
References: <20070817130011.680c5fe4@localhost>	<200708171226.l7HCQGlY032593@wrenkasky.com>	<20070817165300.375250a9@localhost>
	<46C5B92F.3070505@beta.intcomgrp.com>
In-Reply-To: <46C5B92F.3070505@beta.intcomgrp.com>
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Sourcefire acquires ClamAV
X-BeenThere: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Id: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users.lists.clamav.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
List-Help: <mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>,
	<mailto:clamav-users-request@lists.clamav.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net
Errors-To: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net

James Kosin wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>> Ed Kasky wrote:
>>> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>>>>
>>>> lead the advancement of ClamAV and the CVD as employees of Sourcefire.
>>>> Both the ClamAV engine and the signature database will remain under GPL.
>>>
>>> Until they start charging for current updates, etc. like they do with
>>> Snort...
>>
>> you should rest assured that the virus database will stay GPL and will be
>> distributed the same way as so far, Sourcefire has no intention of changing
>> this.
> 
> I'm complaining now...  because the virus database is not the source
> to build the binaries.  If hey are only saying the virus database is
> the ONLY part to stay GPL we may have to pay through the nose for the
> source to build the compiled binaries!
> 
> I'm HOPING this hasn't happened and you mis-typed your reply.

The original email said that BOTH would remain under the GPL.

However, there's nothing about the GPL that prevents them from charging 
money.  GPL is free as in speech, not free as in beer or lunch.  After 
all, I made a nice chunk of change working for a company that "made free 
software expensive" (Cygnus with gcc/gdb).

On the other hand, if sourcefire starts to charge money, there's nothing 
that would prevent the community from starting a new distribution of the 
codebase, either.


I don't exactly blame the ClamAV team for doing this.  It's entirely 
within their rights, and it has been nice that they've had ClamAV out 
there in the form it has been for all of this time ... but it was also 
nice to have a non-corporate driven AV solution out there, especially 
one that had the solid reputation of ClamAV.  No matter what sourcefire 
does with the project, completely free or subscription driven, etc., the 
fact is that ClamAV isn't the same starting today.  It's now just 
another AV product, instead of a community project.  That's kind of sad.


_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

