From clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net Thu Apr 26 12:50:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: list@tad.clamav.net Delivered-To: list@tad.clamav.net X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZ+JSdsRavMJ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:50:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D2616C071; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:50:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net Delivered-To: clamav-users@tad.clamav.net X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net Received: from tad.clamav.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tad.clamav.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HzaPZQwJQ3ba for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.inode.at (mx09.lb01.inode.at [62.99.145.9]) by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140E816C06E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [85.127.182.85] (port=9774 helo=phil.urban.intra) by smartmx-09.inode.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1Hh1YS-00030V-40 for clamav-users@lists.clamav.net; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:50:28 +0200 From: Urban Hillebrand To: ClamAV users ML Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:51:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200704250100.43290.uml1@inode.at> <20070425204048.6bb534cd@Wierszokleta> In-Reply-To: <20070425204048.6bb534cd@Wierszokleta> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704261251.49548.uml1@inode.at> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays X-BeenThere: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ClamAV users ML List-Id: ClamAV users ML List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net Errors-To: clamav-users-bounces@lists.clamav.net Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2007 20:40 schrieb Tomasz Kojm: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200 > > Urban Hillebrand wrote: [...] > > With the newly introduced delays during the initialization of clamscan > > this would cause us significant problems. So my question is: Will this > > get fixed, or is this "working as expected"? > > We're aware of the problem and it will be fixed in 0.91. Thats good news, thanks a lot. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html